Re: OT: Spam filters

Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Has anyone figured out how to "un-train" a spam filter when it becomes
too strict? Mine now catches all email from a certain project, despite
the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls
are set to exclude any email from senders that are.

IMHO spam filters are a pain in the ass. They always delete the e-mail
from your most important customer or remove the files you need most.

My e-mail address is provided on a need-to-know basis which works
quite well :-)

--
Reply to nico@nctdevpuntnl (punt=.)
Bedrijven en winkels vindt U op www.adresboekje.nl
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Spam filters
    ... JackShephard wrote: ... too strict? ... Mine now catches all email from a certain project, despite the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls are set to exclude any email from senders that are. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Spam filters
    ... too strict? ... the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls ... I'm just a troll, right? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Spam filters
    ... JackShephard wrote: ... too strict? ... Mine now catches all email from a certain project, despite the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls are set to exclude any email from senders that are. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Spam filters
    ... On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 20:35:09 GMT, Joerg ... too strict? ... the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • RE: fixed list combinatorics
    ... use strict; ... sub combinations { ... This e-mail may contain confidential information. ... Any opinion expressed in this e-mail is personal to the sender ...
    (perl.beginners)