Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:05:43 -0400
In article <466d8f42.624026692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nico@xxxxxxxxxxx
says...
Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Has anyone figured out how to "un-train" a spam filter when it becomes
too strict? Mine now catches all email from a certain project, despite
the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls
are set to exclude any email from senders that are.
IMHO spam filters are a pain in the ass. They always delete the e-mail
from your most important customer or remove the files you need most.
My e-mail address is provided on a need-to-know basis which works
quite well :-)
That worked for my work account, for a while. Even though I never
gave my Notes ID to anyone outside the company, I did start getting
SPAM. It was better than my POP ID though. I got so much spam I
just stopped reading email on it.
--
Keith
.
- References:
- OT: Spam filters
- From: Joerg
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: Nico Coesel
- OT: Spam filters
- Prev by Date: Re: Digikey packing slip woes
- Next by Date: Re: On this date in 1953...
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Spam filters
- Next by thread: OT: The damn military has too much damn influence!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|