Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but

On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:02:08 -0700, "J.A. Legris"
<jalegris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jun 30, 1:49 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:59:07 +0200, martin griffith

<mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Nice pic here, of the ISS white elephant

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070628.html

and it was taken from the ground

martin

I wonder how many hundred billion dollars more, and how many more
lives, we will lose before we abandon that idiotic idea. Return on
investment so far has been zero.

John

The starry-eyed optimist's view. We pessimists see it as one of the
few things worth doing.

Why worth doing? Nothing is happening in the ISS except trying to
maintain the ISS. It's proven how dangerous and difficult it is to
keep humans alive in space. That's all. It is not a bridge to
anywhere, much less to the stars.

"The shuttle was built to service the space station, and the space
station was built as a place for the shuttles to go."

The unmanned stuff - Pluto orbiters, comet missions, Mars rovers, have
been spectacular.

John

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hubble Marching orders
    ... One reason for this is that the space station was ... It's Dead, Greg. ... ISS and just shut down the program and Shuttle now? ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: "The Shuttle Was a Mistake"
    ... >In hindsight, I'd say that the shuttle and the ISS ... >a space station that didn't exist until 20 years after the shuttle's launch. ... How would you achieve the goals of exploration and scientific ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
    ... Nothing is happening in the ISS except trying to ... "The shuttle was built to service the space station, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Orbital mechanics folks...why does the ISS reboost matter?
    ... Isn't the position of the space station more or less random along the orbital path at the time the plane crosses over KSC? ... Does increasing the station's altitude (and incresing the time needed for a full orbit) really make such a big change to the relative position of ISS to KSC at the time the orbital plane passes over KSC? ... I can understand that having ISS higher/slower means that with the Shuttle's initial lower orbit, the speed difference between the two is greater, which means the shuttle can close the gap to catch up to the ISS faster. ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Is This Getting Old Yet?
    ... Henry knows that "scrap the existing hardware" is necessary because all of ... the existing hardware was designed to be launched on the shuttle. ... That and even if you could get the ISS modules into orbit, ... was never built. ...
    (sci.space.history)