Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- From: "Robert" <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 06:43:25 GMT
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:j6kd835imtu0ocoloi6fhnsqgvu6pcc02i@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:02:08 -0700, "J.A. Legris"
<jalegris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 30, 1:49 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:59:07 +0200, martin griffith
<mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nice pic here, of the ISS white elephant
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070628.html
and it was taken from the ground
martin
I wonder how many hundred billion dollars more, and how many more
lives, we will lose before we abandon that idiotic idea. Return on
investment so far has been zero.
John
The starry-eyed optimist's view. We pessimists see it as one of the
few things worth doing.
Why worth doing? Nothing is happening in the ISS except trying to
maintain the ISS. It's proven how dangerous and difficult it is to
keep humans alive in space. That's all. It is not a bridge to
anywhere, much less to the stars.
"The shuttle was built to service the space station, and the space
station was built as a place for the shuttles to go."
The unmanned stuff - Pluto orbiters, comet missions, Mars rovers, have
been spectacular.
John
IIRC, the argument has been made that the "people" won't support just Robots
in Space. That it takes People up there doing stuff to keep the General
Populace, not the Tech Crowd, behind the Space Program.
<shrug>
Don't know.
Robert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- From: Robert Latest
- Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- References:
- Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- Prev by Date: Re: topology suggestions for 3.5kW batt charger?
- Next by Date: Re: OT but still techy: Stupid Cell Phone Features
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- Next by thread: Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|