Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- From: anno4000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Jul 2007 11:18:17 GMT
David L. Jones <altzone@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in sci.electronics.design:
[...]
Problems:
1) You are driving the relays directly with a 4017, that's *bad*. A
4017 will not have enough output current to do that. You are using low
power reed relays, but it's still too much for a 4017.
2) You can't use a relay driver board to provide clock pulses to a
4017, in fact this probably the worst possible way I can think of to
do this. You'll get ridiculous amounts of contact bounces causing
multiple pluses.
I've always taken for granted (meaning I never checked) that reed
contacts don't bounce. Not that that would make them an appropriate
device for clock generation.
Anno
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- References:
- 4017 Counter skips under load
- From: jcargile2001
- Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- From: jcargile2001
- Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- From: David L. Jones
- 4017 Counter skips under load
- Prev by Date: Re: DRAM data persistence
- Next by Date: Re: OT: A bit of a long shot, but
- Previous by thread: Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- Next by thread: Re: 4017 Counter skips under load
- Index(es):