Re: DTMF dead?
- From: nospam <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:55:29 +0100
nico@xxxxxxxxxxx (Nico Coesel) wrote:
The sort of wiring hasn't been nailed down yet, but at this moment I
would prefer a system with 2 wires which carry both power and
communication. RS485 is also in the picture, but we need to have up to
several hundred devices on a short bus (say 20 meters / 60 feet). I
think this would be stretching RS485 too much to its limits even at
low baud rates.
I think the cost of components to apply a modulation to power lines
(presumably with several hundred regulators hung across them and a hefty
power supply at one end) and demodulating the same is going to be a lot
more than 1 or 2 extra pins on a plug and socket and an extra bit of cable.
Because you were considering DTMF it sounds like you can afford to be dog
slow (10 baud?). I think I would be looking at a single data line with 24v
(or more) logic levels, pulled up at the master with open collector/drain
drives. The receiver could probably be as crude as a high impedance voltage
divider tapping down to processor logic levels. One extra connector pin,
one LL MOSFET and 2 resistors - sounds cheap to me.
--
.
- References:
- DTMF dead?
- From: Nico Coesel
- Re: DTMF dead?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: DTMF dead?
- From: Nico Coesel
- Re: DTMF dead?
- From: Mook Johnson
- Re: DTMF dead?
- From: Nico Coesel
- DTMF dead?
- Prev by Date: Re: A mobile phone display that's less than 1mm thick [PIC]
- Next by Date: solid-state doorbell control
- Previous by thread: Re: DTMF dead?
- Next by thread: Re: DTMF dead?
- Index(es):
Loading