Re: Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- From: Mike Harrison <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:01:48 GMT
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:19:48 -0700, Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello Folks,
Question: It seems that most portable DSOs in the 200MHz/1GSPS class
don't offer delayed trigger anymore which makes pulse-echo measurements
a real pain. Why don't they?
After all it's just a simple counter that is needed. Same for hold-off
which typically ain't there either :-(
Beats me but IIRC I used delayed trigger on a lower end TDS220 although
its data *** said that it could not do it. However, that scope had
some other serious issues (noise) so I asked the client to obtain a used
2265. Old Faithful, of course, always has delayed trigger but sure
enough the plastic clutch for that function fell apart right away.
Designing a trigger delay into an analog scope is no small feat but for
a DSO it should be really easy.
Is it that it isn't there, or is no longer an explicit feature - you just scroll the display..?.
I find it hard to believe that any digital scope doesn't have holdoff.... can you name specific
models?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- References:
- Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- From: Joerg
- Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: is the AGW bubble about to burst?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: is the AGW bubble about to burst?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- Next by thread: Re: Why no delayed trigger on newer DSOs?
- Index(es):