Re: proper response?
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:55:58 -0500
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:12:05 -0700, the renowned John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just finished designing another board, a waveform generator, and I
asked one of my guys, my most-recent hire actually, to look it over
before we gerber it. He said "I really don't have my head into what I
was doing, so I'll take a day or so and give it a full check assuming
that it was designed by an idiot."
What should I have replied to a statement like that?
John
"Sounds good"?
Would you want him checking it under the assumption the designer (you)
is infallible, or do you want him checking all the stupid little
things that are the ones that usually go wrong (not the big
complicated things, which are usually foremost in one's mind during
the design process).
Of course "Goodbye" is another possible answer, and it's your
perogative.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: proper response?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: proper response?
- References:
- proper response?
- From: John Larkin
- proper response?
- Prev by Date: Re: proper response?
- Next by Date: Re: proper response?
- Previous by thread: Re: proper response?
- Next by thread: Re: proper response?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|