Re: unclear on the concept
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:57:55 -0700
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:23:47 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
"Sir. The reason I'm calling is to ask you for your phone number."
Lilly Tomlin on 'Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In', "Have I reached the
party to whom I'm speaking?"
BTW, my spell checker tried to replace 'Laugh-In' with 'Larkin'.
Did you add me to your dictionary?
Actually, "Larkin" is an occupation-derived name, like Baker or
Fletcher. It means something like woodsman or groundskeeper.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Rich Grise, Plainclothes Hippie
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: unclear on the concept
- References:
- unclear on the concept
- From: John Larkin
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Tim Williams
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- unclear on the concept
- Prev by Date: Re: Ferrites
- Next by Date: Re: proper response?
- Previous by thread: Re: unclear on the concept
- Next by thread: Re: unclear on the concept
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|