Re: unclear on the concept
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:01:39 -0400
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:23:47 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
"Sir. The reason I'm calling is to ask you for your phone number."
Lilly Tomlin on 'Rowan & Martin's Laugh-In', "Have I reached the
party to whom I'm speaking?"
BTW, my spell checker tried to replace 'Laugh-In' with 'Larkin'.
Did you add me to your dictionary?
Yes. All of the regular posters who contribute have been added, with
the other extreme added to the 'dim probe' bucket filters.
Actually, "Larkin" is an occupation-derived name, like Baker or
Fletcher. It means something like woodsman or groundskeeper.
Interesting. I have no idea what 'Terrell' means, or where it comes
from.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
.
- References:
- unclear on the concept
- From: John Larkin
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Tim Williams
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: unclear on the concept
- From: John Larkin
- unclear on the concept
- Prev by Date: Re: proper response?
- Next by Date: Re: Americans are even bigger IDIOTS than I thought ! GOD trumps science.
- Previous by thread: Re: unclear on the concept
- Next by thread: Re: unclear on the concept
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
