Re: proper response?
- From: Rene Tschaggelar <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:51:02 +0200
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:42:56 +0200, Rene Tschaggelar <none@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
I just finished designing another board, a waveform generator, and I
asked one of my guys, my most-recent hire actually, to look it over
before we gerber it. He said "I really don't have my head into what I
was doing, so I'll take a day or so and give it a full check assuming
that it was designed by an idiot."
What should I have replied to a statement like that?
Time to rethink your hiring strategy ?
Yeah, I wish I could find more guys like this one.
Your giving him the credit to have a thorough look is
brilliant. But how much of the project is involved?
Is the Serial / USB / Ethernet interface the optimal choice ?
Is the knobs & switches / PC visual / capacitive buttons & LCD user interface the optimal soulution ?
You're not after the right footprint and track/track
coupling of the layout ? The mounting holes are at the right
position ?
You're rather after is the board likely to pass the tests,
minimum self interference, does it meet the timing. Whatever
he finds, there is always something to learn.
Rene
.
- References:
- proper response?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: proper response?
- From: Rene Tschaggelar
- Re: proper response?
- From: John Larkin
- proper response?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Where to learn about airflow/temperature?
- Next by Date: OT;W98 popularity
- Previous by thread: Re: proper response?
- Next by thread: Ferrites
- Index(es):