Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:17:43 +0100
Eeyore wrote:
Simon S Aysdie wrote:
I have heard it claimed that a passenger jet -- if fully or near fully
booked -- is in the same neighborhood for energy/beeLine as the
average passenger car (w/ one person).
Depending on your choice of car for comparison (and I don't mean SUVs) etc, it
may actually be more like 1/2 what a car would consume for the same length
journey.
[A380] the plane's fuel consumption will be 2.9 liters (0.76 gallon) per
passenger per 100 kilometers (60 miles)
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0118_050118_airbus.html
That's 79 mpg (US).
I gather the 787 will have similar figures. This articlesays Boeing claim even
better
http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/boeing-rolls-ou.html
Boeing calculates that the 787 will deliver fuel consumption of approximately 2.4
l/100 passenger-kilometers, assuming average modal load factors.
That's 95 mpg (US).
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- References:
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- From: Eeyore
- Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: PeteS
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Simon S Aysdie
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- Prev by Date: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by Date: Re: What's the Toughest Branch in Electronics?
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|