Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: MooseFET <kensmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:02:54 -0700
On Sep 10, 9:17 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Simon S Aysdie wrote:
I have heard it claimed that a passenger jet -- if fully or near fully
booked -- is in the same neighborhood for energy/beeLine as the
average passenger car (w/ one person).
Depending on your choice of car for comparison (and I don't mean SUVs) etc, it
may actually be more like 1/2 what a car would consume for the same length
journey.
[A380] the plane's fuel consumption will be 2.9 liters (0.76 gallon) per
passenger per 100 kilometers (60 miles)http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0118_050118_airbus.html
That's 79 mpg (US).
I gather the 787 will have similar figures. This articlesays Boeing claim even
betterhttp://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/07/boeing-rolls-ou.html
Boeing calculates that the 787 will deliver fuel consumption of approximately 2.4
l/100 passenger-kilometers, assuming average modal load factors.
That's 95 mpg (US).
Yes, if you want to stop global warming and save the planet, everyone
should drive a 787. :)
The Boeing design is a lot more streamlined than the Airbus. The
difference isn't in the engines which can be easily changed as newer
and better ones come along. I remember some years back reading that a
small plane got about 125MPG.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- From: Eeyore
- Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: PeteS
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Simon S Aysdie
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- Prev by Date: LCD display controller
- Next by Date: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|