Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:13:31 +0100
MooseFET wrote:
I remember some years back reading that a small plane got about 125MPG.
No way. A microlight maybe ?
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- References:
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- From: Eeyore
- Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: PeteS
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Simon S Aysdie
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: MooseFET
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- Prev by Date: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by Date: Re: Productivity - Norway leads the table.
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
