Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: z <gzuckier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:56:33 -0700
On Sep 10, 4:13 pm, j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I always liked dirigibles.
They need to find some other gas to keep them up. The pictures
of the burning Hindenberg doesn't exactly pique my interest in riding
in one
Yes, but it was only producing H2O, no CO2.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: jfma
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- References:
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- From: Eeyore
- Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: PeteS
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: z
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: jfma
- OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: getting rid of the medieval warm period
- Next by Date: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|