Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tom Bruhns <k7itm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:25:16 -0700
On Sep 11, 11:15 am, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Tom Bruhns wrote:....
how much you can do. At a 45MHz center frequency, without going
really overboard with the LC filter, you probably will end up with a
3dB bandwidth at least a couple MHz wide. To do much better while
keeping the filter loss low requires coils with high Q, which get
physically large.
That's where the old concept of the Q-multiplier comes in. After that it
only boils down to how good you are able to control the CF of a resonant
circuit up front. But shhht, don't tell anyone. The younger lads out
there don't have the foggiest idea what that is.
Ouch! Not around my designs, thank you. :-(
[For the uninitiated: just stay away from them.]
Cheers,
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Joerg
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- References:
- Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Joel Kolstad
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tom Bruhns
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tom Bruhns
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Tom Bruhns
- Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- From: Joerg
- Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- Prev by Date: Re: Recommended USB oscilloscopes?
- Next by Date: Re: analog circuits for voltage and current isolators
- Previous by thread: Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- Next by thread: Re: Matching a monolithic xtal filter
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|