Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst

In article <1189568733.862078.153650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Richard Henry wrote:
On Sep 11, 12:56 pm, z <gzuck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 10, 4:13 pm, j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I always liked dirigibles.

They need to find some other gas to keep them up. The pictures
of the burning Hindenberg doesn't exactly pique my interest in riding
in one

Yes, but it was only producing H2O, no CO2.

Most of the hydrogen escaped unburned. The spectacular flames came
from the envelope.

I thought hydrogen burns with a dim blue flame that is easily invisible
in broad daylight. So does methanol. I would expect the hydrogen to have
mostly burned since the whole thing went up in flames and hydrogen is
really flammable.

- Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)
.

Quantcast