Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 00:04:41 GMT
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:24:05 -0400, James Beck wrote:
Richard the Dreaded Libertarian says:
I wonder when the greenies decided they hate plants now? Did theyActually, if you look at a mature forest (of any type) they tend to be
forget that the rain forests (which were their favorite shibboleth a
few years ago) inhale CO2 and get healthier, and exhale O2, which we
breathe?
Al Gore, why do you hate the rain forests?
carbon neutral. They system only is a carbon sink when it is comprised
of new growth.
And in a sanely managed tree farm, anywhere from 5-10% of the plants at
any given time are _brand new_, seedlings, replacements for the ones that
have been harvested. So, in essence, the majority of it is new growth,
during its maturation from seedling to timber grade.
But cut off their CO2 supply and even the old growth will suffocate.
Why do they think that's a good thing? Why do they think milder weather
is a bad thing?
Well, those are rhetorical questions, the answer is obvious - they're
insane.
Cheers!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: James Beck
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- References:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Simon S Aysdie
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Charlie Edmondson
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: James Beck
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Prev by Date: Re: Fossett plane sighting another false lead
- Next by Date: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|