Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Martin Griffith <mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:23:55 +0200
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:58:44 -0400, in sci.electronics.design
jfma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:15:38 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:46:42 -0700, James Arthur
<dagmargoodboat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 10, 11:31 pm, bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sep 11, 2:11 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Gore is a fraud.
You'd be wise to have good evidence to support that claim. He's got
enough money to be in a position to sue you for libel if you haven't.
What a lovely threat.
Don't worry Bill, Graham's perfectly safe: here you're allowed to say
such things, and truth is an absolute defense in such cases. Graham's
on firm ground here.
Cheers,
James Arthur
The libel lews are different in the USA. "Public figures" are pretty
much fair game for criticism. If, say, Time Magazine published
something that was untrue *and* caused serious economic damage to Mr
Gore (cut into his carbon trading profits, say) then he might have
cause for action.
Gore is a fraud, of course, and a tedious fathead to boot.
John
Gore should be sued by the people that actually did invent the
internet.
James F. Mayer
President
J F M Electronic Systems, Inc. Surge Protection for Access Control
E-Mail jfma@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Web Page http://home.netcom.com/~jfma/
EarthLink Revolves Around You.
I think a Mr. Vinton Cerf had a few things to say about Gore's
inolvement with the interwebs.
It's here:
http://amsterdam.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0009/msg00311.html
Martin
.
- References:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: z
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: jfma
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Prev by Date: Re: Electronic ballasts with 2-wire dimming
- Next by Date: Re: Custom search engine to exclude parts spammers
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|