Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:01:44 -0700
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 07:30:27 -0700, MooseFET <kensmith@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sep 14, 10:16 pm, TheKraken
<ReachUpandSuckYouDowntotheDep...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:51:23 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, Windows is not a modern OS, and x86 is not a modern processor.
Given decent hardware tools, an OS should abort a process that tries
to execute data.
You're an idiot.
No, he is right. The Harvard architecture may be an exception because
"trying execute data" may be meaningless in that sort of processor.
Even a Von Neuman machine with memory management is in effect a
Harvard machine. There's no excuse for executing data or stack spaces.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: MooseFET
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- References:
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: krw
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: MooseFET
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: krw
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: John Larkin
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: John Larkin
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: MooseFET
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Prev by Date: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Next by Date: Re: Productivity - Norway leads the table.
- Previous by thread: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Next by thread: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|