Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:29:39 -0700
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:13:11 +0100, Nobody <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When the overrun corrupts the process' own memory, the process continues
to run as if nothing untoward has happened, but it is now doing the
bidding of the attacker.
Right. The first thing an OS should do is protect itself from a
pathological process. But it should also manage data, code, and stack
spaces such as to make it very, very difficult for anything internal
or external to corrupt user-level processes.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: David Brown
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- References:
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: krw
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: MooseFET
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: krw
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: John Larkin
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: MooseFET
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- From: Nobody
- Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Prev by Date: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Next by Date: Re: adaptive equalizers for LVDS data over CAT5
- Previous by thread: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Next by thread: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Index(es):