Re: RS-485 arrangements
- From: Jamie <jamie_ka1lpa_not_valid_after_ka1lpa_@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:18:33 -0400
Richard Henry wrote:
I have long been familiar with RS-485 wired as a single differentialslave devices don't talk unless spoken to.
pair connected to all the devices and termination at the both ends,
however "end" may be defined. I have recently been looking into a 4-
wire "full-duplex" implementation. However, it seems to be full-
duplex only if there are only two devices attached. Otherwise, there
appears to be a need to designate one device as the master (the device
to whose receiver all the other drivers are connected) and the rest as
slaves.
Unless there is some clever arrangement of which I am ignorant. Any
comments?
For reference:
http://datasheets.maxim-ic.com/en/ds/MAX3483-MAX3491.pdf
http://www.bb-elec.com/tech_articles/rs422_485_app_note/system_configuration.asp
this means, You need a protocol.
MODBUS is a good example.. Look it up.
--
"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RS-485 arrangements
- From: TT_Man
- Re: RS-485 arrangements
- References:
- RS-485 arrangements
- From: Richard Henry
- RS-485 arrangements
- Prev by Date: Re: SPICEing The Inductance of a Trace Over a Ground Plane?
- Next by Date: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Previous by thread: Re: RS-485 arrangements
- Next by thread: Re: RS-485 arrangements
- Index(es):