Re: Slightly OT: The paperless office: How far can we go?
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:46:40 GMT
Benj wrote:
Joerg wrote:
b. Document retention: Are there any "cast-in-concrete" rules over what
constitutes proper records after they are scanned in? Can you really,
really toss the paper copy afterwards?
One "cast in concrete" rule about paper retention is how IMPORTANT are
the documents?
Many aren't after a while. For example, design docs will also reside at my clients and sometimes my consulting agreements require the destruction of my copies after a phase is complete. So here backup times are short. Other docs aren't important in general but maybe an agency such as the IRS wants to see some.
Now, assuming that I am diligent enough to store on media that are safe, keeping multiple copies and so on, what constitutes a document scan to be good enough in authenticity versus the paper original? That's what I want to know.
Never forget the "Jacoby rule": "If it's on magnetic media it AIN'T
backed up!"
Sure but there are ways to increase security. As we all know drive space becomes plentiful and ever cheaper. I still have docs on magnetic storage from back when I started in the late 80's. The old floppies are still readable but important stuff is also copied onto newer media. And those will be copied onto the next generation, so it's always on a fresh carrier. All the electronic docs from the first ten years of my career will fit onto the new network storage here about 50,000 times over. Yep, that's fiftythousand. Plenty of space for cheap backup, as long as you don't trust in a single device and keep offsite copies as well.
The real question about "tossing paper copies" is how stable is your
archival storage media. In case you didn't notice paper has EXCELLENT
archival properties. Acid-free paper even more so. Magnetic media
just plain sucks which means data must be constantly regenerated to be
archival. Optical media has promise but lifetimes are unknown. All
digital media have the obsolescence problem where after so many years
hardware for reading media can no longer be obtained. These are all
VERY serious questions of importance to the "paperless" office and
many have not yet be effectively solved or answered.
Many "modern" papers aren't that good. Your typical computer store slip off their cash register is gone after 4-5 years, barely more than the IRS requires. Thermal faxes, same thing, maybe 6-8 years.
CDs, well, I am a bit skeptical after I had a few delaminate.
Early in the days of computing I came up with a system of "bar codes"
that could put relatively high density data (for the period) on paper
to utilize the archival properties of paper while still retaining
machine-readable copies. Today the system is pitifully primitive.
However, the same kind of idea using oxide-covered silicon wafers
would seem to provide truly excellent archival storage capability.
The technology, however, has not been developed.
Micro-fiche is an option but often the cost and space for the gear isn't warranted.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Next by Date: Re: How to develop a random number generation device
- Previous by thread: Re: Slightly OT: The paperless office: How far can we go?
- Next by thread: DITECH MORTGAGE
- Index(es):