Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst

From: Robert Adsett <sub2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:27:06 -0400

In article <gi2ue3lu76994i5ij50q8gl9djrmti76bc@xxxxxxx>, Jonathan Kirwan
says...

is easily ?poisoned? by CO or other gases. And so far, fuel cells
cannot be operated at elevated temperatures -- they need to be less
than 80C to run.

True for PEM and Alkaline but SOFCs at least operate at much higher
temperatures.

Robert

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Jonathan Kirwan

References:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: z
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: jfma
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: bill . sloman
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Eeyore
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Don Klipstein
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Don Klipstein
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
  - From: Jonathan Kirwan

Prev by Date: Re: RS-485 arrangements
Next by Date: Re: Slightly OT: The paperless office: How far can we go?
Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread