Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:06:08 -0000
On Sep 20, 3:57 pm, Rich Grise <r...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:05:07 +0000, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 19, 2:10 pm, John Larkin
Please forgive us. We are engineers, and we build things that actually
work, and that sometimes gives us an irrational prejudice against
raving lunatics.
And your all-knowing profound naysayism of your applied technology-
fuckology is based upon what sort of conditional laws of physics?
Well, there's conservation of energy, for one, but I've never heard
that it was conditional. Hmmmmm.....
Good Luck!
Rich
Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics,
although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200
empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot
end-user is going to require some degree of luck.
- Brad Guth -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Electric Car
- References:
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: The Electric Car
- Prev by Date: Re: The Electric Car
- Next by Date: Re: nice DVM
- Previous by thread: Re: The Electric Car
- Next by thread: Re: The Electric Car
- Index(es):
Loading