Re: The Electric Car

On Sep 23, 9:20 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:50:28 -0000, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


On Sep 23, 7:41 pm, ChairmanOfTheBored <RUBo...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:25:18 -0000, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 22, 5:48 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:06:46 -0000,BradGuth<bradg...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Sep 22, 1:29 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
BradGuthwrote:
Luck has little if anything to do with those regular laws of physics,
although the R&D science of getting this 100 empg Hummer or the 200
empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot
end-user is going to require some degree of luck.

The 'regular laws of physics' are going to prevent both of those ever happening.

Graham

Arnt you being a silly brown-nosed clown again, and for otherwise
being stuck in that land of naysayism, as representing your one and
only status quo norm.

Some of us are sharing about getting the most clean and best possible
empg per given volume or mass of fossil fuel, such as for using that
fossil fuel along with h2o2 instead of badly burning our polluted
atmosphere that's mostly N2. What the naysay puck on a stick are you
thinking of?
- Brad Guth -

Methinks Brad proves that ignorance IS an excuse.

Methinks you're another brown-noed minion of the Third Reich, or
perhaps of something far worse since you folks continually claim to
know all there is to know, and then some.
- Brad Guth -

Let's just say that you are not providing us with any breakthrough,
startlingly "new" information, dumbass.

That is true, because those related laws of physics certainly haven't
changed, and there's not really any new and improved science from the
past few decades.

In other words, the h2o2 + whatever fuel combinations are still the
same, still capable of offering a zero NOx and minimal CO2 exhaust,

Conventional piston engines don't make obnoxious amounts of nitrogen
oxides. Seems to me that H2O2 is an awfully inefficient way to get
oxygen, when it's free for the asking all around us.

H2O2 is a damned expensive way to transport oxygen. And aluminum is a
damned expensive way to transport electricity.

You folks still can't think inside or much less outside the box, can
you.


and still capable of getting 100 empg on behalf of that hybrid Hummer,
or 200 empg from that GM Volt. Just exactly like the clean energy
extracted from the sun, wind or whatever hydroelectrics including
tidal derived energy is still representing the same old clean and
renewable energy on behalf of delivering multiple teraWatts (as many
as you'd like), just as it was capable of accomplishing such as of
decades ago.

Explain to us what is the relationship between H2O2 and all those
terawatts of clean, cheap energy. Since we're engineers, some numbers
would be appreciated.

Wild idea breakthroughs are a staple around here. The burden of proof
is on the presenter, to explain why it might work and then to explain
why it isn't already being done. Sorry, conspiracy theories are not
accepted.

I've posted such numbers dozens of times, and your PC or MAC can
otherwise search for and thus uncover all the fancy numbers you'd care
to review. However, from time to time I'll edit and thereby revise
upon a given application.

What is it about the clean and renewable 40 kw/m2 of a given tower
footprint of solar and wind derived energy do you not understand?

If not for the makings of h2o2 and aluminum, what else would you smart
folks do with a spare teraWatt of energy?

How else would you go about burning coal at it's peak efficiency
without water, at minimal CO2 and without causing NOx?

BTW, here's a wild idea breakthrough:
A piston engine of 4 cycles is about as mechanically inefficient of an
IC enigne as it gets, and the burning of a mostly N2 atmosphere is
every bit as dumbfounded physics on steroids as it gets, and the last
time I'd checked that's no conspiracy theory.
- Brad Guth -

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Electric Car
    ... empg GM Volt into the dumbfounded hands of the typical village idiot ... the h2o2 + whatever fuel combinations are still the ... or 200 empg from that GM Volt. ... Just exactly like the clean energy ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: The Electric Car
    ... Our failing environment badly needs that do or die kick in our fossil ... much global renewable energy put in charge of producing the raw h2o2 ... safe energy, or even of those products made with said energy. ... Nearly any kind of fossil or biofuel alternatives will suit the needs ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Renewable hydrogen is possible today
    ... China's surplus cache of electrical energy. ... better results when combusting h2o2 along with a little of whatever ... w/o creating those nasty elements of NOx. ... using hydrogen/air, we'd soon die off because of the excessive amounts ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: America will never go back to the Moon.
    ... The energy companies have gotten so big that they manage the ... The use of H2O2 could reduce the amount of carbon fuels burned by ... electricity is needed the wind isn’t blowing or it is a cloudy day. ... called intelligent life on this planet. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Low cost hydrogen today
    ... differences in fuel system fractions are show stoppers. ... regardless of the large energy density differences, ... that's a total weight of 73.86 pounds. ... H2O2 is also less costly than batteries. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
Loading