Re: The Electric Car
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:58:36 +0100
BradGuth wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Wild idea breakthroughs are a staple around here. The burden of proof
is on the presenter, to explain why it might work and then to explain
why it isn't already being done. Sorry, conspiracy theories are not
accepted.
I've posted such numbers dozens of times
No you haven't.
If you were SERIOUS you'd post them on a website instead of expecting people to search (for
stupidity and who wants to look for a lload of nonsense). Have you ANY IDEA how difficult it is
to trawl through old Usenet posts looking for a 'needle in a haystack' ?
In any case your 'numbers' must be wrong. It barely requires high-school grade maths to show
that your ideas are completely INSANE.
The most important fact is that H2O2 doesn't improve 'mpg'. In fact (taking the total energy
burden of manufacturing it) it degrades it.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- References:
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- Prev by Date: Re: The Electric Car
- Next by Date: Re: A lump in cord design...
- Previous by thread: Re: The Electric Car
- Next by thread: Re: The Electric Car
- Index(es):
Loading