Re: The Electric Car
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:05:43 +0100
John Larkin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Wild idea breakthroughs are a staple around here. The burden of proof
is on the presenter, to explain why it might work and then to explain
why it isn't already being done. Sorry, conspiracy theories are not
accepted.
I've posted such numbers dozens of times, and your PC or MAC can
otherwise search for and thus uncover all the fancy numbers you'd care
to review. However, from time to time I'll edit and thereby revise
upon a given application.
OK, refresh my memory: if we convert aluminum oxide to metallic
aluminum by electrolytic smelting, and convert the aluminum back to
electricity in a Al-H2O2 battery, what's the net efficiency?
Brad Gruth doesn't care about efficiency. In his world there will be limitless
FREE solar power to do this.
At which point of course he simply shows himself to be a clueless IDIOT.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- References:
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Eeyore
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: BradGuth
- Re: The Electric Car
- From: John Larkin
- Re: The Electric Car
- Prev by Date: Re: about plc
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Blackwater
- Previous by thread: Re: The Electric Car
- Next by thread: Re: The Electric Car
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading