Re: The Electric Car

On Sep 24, 10:05 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Wild idea breakthroughs are a staple around here. The burden of proof
is on the presenter, to explain why it might work and then to explain
why it isn't already being done. Sorry, conspiracy theories are not
accepted.

I've posted such numbers dozens of times, and your PC or MAC can
otherwise search for and thus uncover all the fancy numbers you'd care
to review. However, from time to time I'll edit and thereby revise
upon a given application.

OK, refresh my memory: if we convert aluminum oxide to metallic
aluminum by electrolytic smelting, and convert the aluminum back to
electricity in a Al-H2O2 battery, what's the net efficiency?

Brad Gruth doesn't care about efficiency. In his world there will be limitless
FREE solar power to do this.

I guess you know lots more than most of us village idiots, as to where
that 64,000+ teraWatts of solar energy is going, along with the 7.2e20
kw that's continually existing somewhere between us and our moon, not
to mention terrestrial wind that's seriously kicking our AGW butts,
plus tidal flows and geothermal energy that's clearly for the taking
by those half as smart as Warren Buffett, and that's only demanding
that you be 1% as smart as our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush).

Are you saying thar Eeyore and company isn't 1% as smart as GW Bush?


At which point of course he simply shows himself to be a clueless IDIOT.

At least the mindset of this supposed "clueless IDIOT" hasn't imposed
or otherwise caused any collateral damage or carnage of the innocent.
How about your energy sucking and global polluting self?
- Brad Guth -

.