Re: The Electric Car

BradGuth bradguth@xxxxxxxxx posted to sci.electronics.design:

On Sep 24, 10:05 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
BradGuthwrote:

Wild idea breakthroughs are a staple around here. The burden
of proof is on the presenter, to explain why it might work and
then to explain why it isn't already being done. Sorry,
conspiracy theories are not accepted.

I've posted such numbers dozens of times, and your PC or MAC can
otherwise search for and thus uncover all the fancy numbers
you'd care
to review. However, from time to time I'll edit and thereby
revise upon a given application.

OK, refresh my memory: if we convert aluminum oxide to metallic
aluminum by electrolytic smelting, and convert the aluminum back
to electricity in a Al-H2O2 battery, what's the net efficiency?

Brad Gruth doesn't care about efficiency. In his world there will
be limitless FREE solar power to do this.

I guess you know lots more than most of us village idiots, as to
where that 64,000+ teraWatts of solar energy is going, along with
the 7.2e20 kw that's continually existing somewhere between us and
our moon, not to mention terrestrial wind that's seriously kicking
our AGW butts, plus tidal flows and geothermal energy that's clearly
for the taking by those half as smart as Warren Buffett, and that's
only demanding that you be 1% as smart as our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush).

Are you saying thar Eeyore and company isn't 1% as smart as GW Bush?


At which point of course he simply shows himself to be a clueless
IDIOT.

At least the mindset of this supposed "clueless IDIOT" hasn't
imposed or otherwise caused any collateral damage or carnage of the
innocent. How about your energy sucking and global polluting self?
- Brad Guth -

Well, hell, there you go throwing some large numbers around. where do
they come from? Do you even know? Where did you get 64,000
terawatts? Where did you get 7.2E20 kW?


.