Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst

On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:56:23 +0000, Jonathan Kirwan wrote:

Again. And I repeat myself, sadly. Provide me with just one
peer-reviewed paper on some technical and quantitative facet relating to
climate science that you have actually read thoroughly yourself, with good
understanding, and which well supports some conclusion you've made here on
the topic that disagrees with the IPCC AR4. Just one.

If Al Gore is so right, why has he refused to answer this challenge?
http://ff.org/centers/csspp/docs/20070316_monckton.html

Cheers!
Rich

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Global Warming: Junk science at its [best] worst
    ... some technical and quantitative facet relating to climate science that ... you have actually read thoroughly yourself, with good understanding, ... denial or willful ignorance. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Global Warming: Junk science at its [best] worst
    ... On Oct 1, 2:07 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian ... peer-reviewed paper on some technical and quantitative facet relating to ... climate science that you have actually read thoroughly yourself, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Global Warming: Junk science at its [best] worst
    ... some technical and quantitative facet relating to climate science that ... you have actually read thoroughly yourself, with good understanding, and ... disagrees with the IPCC AR4. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Global Warming: Junk science at its [best] worst
    ... peer-reviewed paper on some technical and quantitative facet relating to ... climate science that you have actually read thoroughly yourself, ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Global Warming: Junk science at its [best] worst
    ... quantitative facet relating to climate science that you have actually ... is not a citation of a peer-reviewed paper, ... prepared for a 'public policy' purpose. ... One of the scientists ...
    (sci.electronics.design)