Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst

On Oct 1, 2:07 pm, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 19:56:23 +0000, Jonathan Kirwan wrote:
Again. And I repeat myself, sadly. Provide me with just one
peer-reviewed paper on some technical and quantitative facet relating to
climate science that you have actually read thoroughly yourself, with good
understanding, and which well supports some conclusion you've made here on
the topic that disagrees with the IPCC AR4. Just one.

If Al Gore is so right, why has he refused to answer this challenge?http://ff.org/centers/csspp/docs/20070316_monckton.html


From a scientific perspective, Al Gore's presentations are
immaterial. Or, to put it another way, as valid as the cartoons you
linked to earlier.

.

Relevant Pages