Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: qrus19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 15:20:17 -0600
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:12:36 GMT, Jonathan Kirwan
<jkirwan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:05:50 -0600, qrus19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Scientists have the science fact on their side. It's as simple as
that. If you imagine that there is no difference between scientists,
science theory, and science result and those just spinning their
wheels on the subject, then you might as well go to Tarot cards or
astrology for your "knowledge."
Jon
That's my point I've seen no more evidience that science is
being used than I would in my local conartists lounge.
KKuurus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- References:
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: KKuurus
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: qrus19
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Prev by Date: Re: Stupid polarized capacitor tricks
- Next by Date: Frequency of batteries
- Previous by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Next by thread: Re: Global Warming: Junk science at it's [best] worst
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|