Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:55:14 -0700
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:22:44 -0700, Simon S Aysdie <gwhite@xxxxxx>
wrote:
On Oct 10, 8:48 am, John Popelish <jpopel...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Phantom wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 01:37:37 -0400, John Popelish <jpopel...@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The Phantom wrote:
John Popelish <jpopel...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Phantom wrote:
MooseFET <kensm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Phantom <phan...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
At this site:
(snip)http://www.4qdtec.com/singen.html
The schematic does show two emitter followers closing the loop. One would
think this couldn't work, but the poster says it does.
(snip)Is Barkhausen wrong?
The unusual part of this twin T is that the component values
are not the usual C and 2*C, 2*R and R. A ratio of about 5
is used, instead. And the way it is connected, instead of
the usual notch response, it has a broad bandpass filter
response with a peak gain of about 1.089 at about 130 Hz,
with the loading effect of the 1n cap but not counting the
darlington.
You get an A+. My mathematical assistant says the max gain of 1.08893
occurs with a ratio of 4.83152 at a frequency of 129.128034 Hz
So it is possible to get a little voltage gain from an RC
circuit.
See: "Synthesis of Passive RC Networks with Gains Greater than Unity",
Herman Epstein, Proceedings of the IRE, July, 1951, p. 833.
I don't have access to this paper.
Budak also has some coverage of RC circuits w/ v-gain, IIRC.
Presumably one could cascade such circuits.
John
.
- References:
- Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: The Phantom
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: The Phantom
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: John Popelish
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: The Phantom
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: John Popelish
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: The Phantom
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: John Popelish
- Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- From: Simon S Aysdie
- Barkhausen must be wrong.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Eudora a good alternative to Thunderbird?
- Next by Date: Re: power + TFT display
- Previous by thread: Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- Next by thread: Re: Barkhausen must be wrong.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|