Defining Sci.Electronics.Design on Wikipedia
- From: D from BC <myrealaddress@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:36:37 -0700
Remember those paper encyclopedia's offered more than a decade ago?
Sometimes people got a book/month.
The whole series can be a few feet in length..
Well those books are really looking like crap now compared to Wiki.
Seems like everything is on Wikipedia
Porn Stars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvia_Saint
Obscure body parts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philtrum
Comics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_man
Obscure TV shows
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot_Chicken
Architecture
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascia_%28architecture%29
Food
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kool_aid
ok...not really food..
Cutting edge tech
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanocircuitry
Weirdass physics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutchison_effect
Fluid Physics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetting
Slang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/***
Electro slang
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tranny
Obscure mechanical parts
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/tang
Sometimes on SED
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Lancaster
Damn...what isn't on Wiki!!?
If I win the lottery I'll donate a good amount to Wiki.. :)
Aha!
Type in sci.electronics.design in wiki and ....zip!
Does this mean SED is not worthy of a Wiki definition?
Anybody have any good descriptions for SED on Wikipedia? :)
(Ohhhh..that's wide open to some fun harshness..)
D from BC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Defining Sci.Electronics.Design on Wikipedia
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: Defining Sci.Electronics.Design on Wikipedia
- From: John Tserkezis
- Re: Defining Sci.Electronics.Design on Wikipedia
- Prev by Date: Re: About the cost of (safety) Standards
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Re: Gore wins Nobel Prize
- Previous by thread: Redneck Culture
- Next by thread: Re: Defining Sci.Electronics.Design on Wikipedia
- Index(es):