Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:01:20 -0700
Marcel Baum wrote:
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:mYITi.12158$4V6.8444@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMarcel Baum wrote:"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:SyrTi.47541$RX.32874@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAh, like an electric razor "motor"? Then you should be able to even shield the coils if necessary.Marcel Baum wrote:"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:qWoTi.36574$eY.32446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYou want to pulse the bridge to get the sine wave and rely on the motor windings to smooth things out? That can backfire the minute the motor manufacturer changes the design. Personally I wouldn't do that. EMC can also become quite a nightmare, as can motor noise.Marcel Baum wrote:I have got a linear pump which needs a sinusoidal excitation.Just to avoid a misunderstanding: The PWM is usually not done with the bridge itself. It is done by a converter up front and that gets the sine-wave control signal. The H-bridge just switches.
The pumpflow is controlled by the amplitude of the AC to the coils
The amplitude is controlled via a DC input signal which on itself can change very fast.
So far I have used a 24VAC pump, which is no longer available, the actual pumps have 230VAC (50hz). The rated power is roughly 150W.
My present design is powered from 24V DC and utilises a full (H-) Mosfet bridge.
The bridge is controlled by a MC 33035 which is a PWM motor controller with an analogue input and a direction signal. The analogue input gets a sine have wave with variable amplitude, the DIR input sees a 50hz TTL signal in phase with the sinus.
To go on with this design I would have to rectify the 230V, change to a 500V Mosfet bridge and to add some HV photocouplers to feed the hi side Fets of the bridge.
Does anyone have better suggestion how to directly modulate the mains AC instead of synthesising the AC from a DC source?
I probably should mention that the pump wants to see a sinus like (or trapezoid) excitation which limits the use of a triac .
Any ideas are welcome.
Thank you for your response
The 33035 has got a pwm on chip, the high side Fet is responsible for the direction the corresponding low side one is pulse modulated according to the actual input voltage.
Its not that expensive here.
Its very much like in the LMD 18245 used with stepper motors (this one is really expensive).
Its not a common motor. Its a pair of coils with an oscillating permanent magnet assembly in between, which actuates two membrane heads.
I use this circuit since 10 years without any problems.
Exactly, and the entire drive is capsuled in an alloy cast, which again sits in a larger tight cabinet. And in addition this pump stands in a closed iron box, mainly for noise and safety reasons. If there is any EMI it wouldn't come out of this 3 fold cage.
The pumps are not close to the patient and they are mounted totally floating in separate compartments, what counts is their leakage current to ground. Since I have an UPS in front, this will mainly determine the leakage current.What I was thinking about is to use an existing DC-AC converter (e.g. 24VDC to 230VAC) lay out and to add a control input for the output voltage. No idea if this exists already. Have you ever looked into something similar?Well, they work pretty much like I described. A switcher around a 3525 generates a voltage between zero and the desired peak voltage, usually as a forward converter. Sinusoidal half-waves. Then the bridge toggles that.
Since this pump is part of a medical life supporting device it has to run on batteries for at least 20 minutes anyway. The most simple way is to run it from a UPS (having its internal batteries), or if not possible use a buffered 24V battery with a DC-AC step up converter.I design medical devices for a living and running an AC motor at over 50V is usually frowned upon by the agency guys. Are you sure you can't get a 24V version anywhere? Also, nearly none of the parts vendors endorses life support applications but I am pretty sure you know that.
I had 24V pumps so far, but all the far east manufacturers of this pump principle stopped the production for this supply voltage. Manufacturers in far east are not that restrictive when applying their products in LSS.
I have 3 pumps in my system, it would be an awful lot of work to strip them down to a level at which I can remove the coils, moreover I would loose the manufacturers certificate for the use in an oxygen enriched environment as soon as I open the hood.
Yes, loss of that certificate would certainly be a bummer.
It is hard enough to persuade them to deliver it with a written certificate. Oxygen is very special, there is a standard defining the maximum amount of grease (oil, fat) per cm^2 of surface in contact with oxygen. Furthermore the material for your membranes , gaskets and sealings have to comply with the standards for oxygen.
Furthermore at this stage my system only goes into veterinary medicine, I have not got the infrastructure to manufacture human medicine devices myself.When first designing something for veterinary use I was surprised that the rules were pretty much as strict as for normal med use, at least in the US. Personally I regard the life of an animal as much as that of a human. The laws may be different sometimes but when they used one of our ultrasound machines on a million Dollar race horse I realized what can be at stake.
Interestingly we have no standards for veterinary medical devices, beside the general IEC 601-1. The requirements for breathing machines used in human anaesthesia are not obligatory for animal use. Anyway my machine will fulfil all this requirements, however the effort in testing the software is by far easier compared to human applications, as is the entire documentation.
Well, you guys don't have to deal with the FDA. That's why us guys often start clinical trials in Europe :-)
Today a one million Dollar horse is put on a horse anaesthesia machine, which is roughly 40 years behind its equivalent for human use. That's one of the reasons why a huge number of horses are experiencing lung problems after a operation of 2 hours.
But this I guess is far off topic.
That's very different here. We have one of the larger vet clinics at UC Davis right here in town. They are using the latest and greatest gear on horses and other animals, not 40 year old stuff. Don't know about anesthesia though, haven't looked at those machines but nothing in that lab looked older than five years.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Marcel Baum
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- References:
- AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Marcel Baum
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Joerg
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Marcel Baum
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Joerg
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Marcel Baum
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Joerg
- Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- From: Marcel Baum
- AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- Prev by Date: Re: A new style Fourier Demodulator
- Next by Date: Re: Please Recommend A Multimeter
- Previous by thread: Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- Next by thread: Re: AC amplitude modulation for inductive loads
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading