Re: A real puzzle...

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:23:54 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<paulh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:06:31 -0700, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
<paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

[snip]

Aren't there more churches in the South ?:-)

Last time I checked, San Diego was pretty far South.

THE South is as explicit a location designator as THE Bay Area.

San Diego is not in THE South.

We need a better designation for that socially backward, economically
disadvantaged region of the USA than just a direction on a compass.

Some people feel that parts of Florida are also not part of "The
South"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_United_States


Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A real puzzle...
    ... Aren't there more churches in the South ?:-) ... San Diego was pretty far South. ... THE South is as explicit a location designator as THE Bay Area. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: A real puzzle...
    ... San Diego was pretty far South. ... THE South is as explicit a location designator as THE Bay Area. ... disadvantaged region of the USA than just a direction on a compass. ... All the rest of THE South are nicely industrializing. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: A real puzzle...
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... Aren't there more churches in the South ?:-) ... San Diego was pretty far South. ... The blinking cursor writes; ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: A real puzzle...
    ... Jim Thompson wrote: ... Aren't there more churches in the South ?:-) ... San Diego was pretty far South. ... THE South is as explicit a location designator as THE Bay Area. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)