Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: JosephKK <joseph_barrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:42:06 -0700
Jeff Liebermann jeffl@xxxxxxxxxx posted to sci.electronics.design:
Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> hath wroth:http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?parentPage=search&pg=3&summary=summary&cp=&productId=2103612&accessories=accessories&kw=plugs&techSpecs=techSpecs¤tTab=techSpecs&custRatings=custRatings&sr=1&features=features&origkw=plugs&support=support&tab=summary
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:24:44 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
How about those coaxial, "power" types, like this?
(mind the wrap)
You might have to modify the plug and socket a bit, and impedance
might be interesting...
That will probably work fine until someone plugs a live AC wall
wart
into the plug and vaporizes your radio. I think they call that an
"attractive nuisance" or "warranty magnet".
Can be remedied by a wee component: A series capacitor :-)
Too easy. I thought this was a low cost design, where every extra
component saved is important. I've seen designs with DC on the
antenna jack in order to save the cost of the capacitor. However,
the
power jack as an antenna connector does present another problem. If
the antenna is part of the FCC type certification, the FCC sometimes
requires a "unique" coax connector to prevent users from
substituting
the antenna and violating the type certification. The reason I say
"sometimes" is that there have been various rulings and variances
that allow the use of not so unique connectors or connectors that
were at
one time unique, but are now commonly available. Anyway, using the
power jack as a coax connector would certainly not qualify as unique
as one could easily obtain one at Radio Shock. Same problem with
the 3.5mm earphone jack.
Incidentally, don't forget to perform the basic antenna field test.
That's where the customer grabs the unit by the antenna and swings
it
around while walking. It's a very common problem with HT's (handie
talkies) and seems to be spreading to wi-fi wireless access points
and
other devices with rubber duckie antennas. If the connect can't
support the unit when held by the antenna, it will fail this all
important field test.
About 25 years ago, my employer embarked on yet another bean
counting
cost reduction adventure. Someone decided that all the coax
cables
connectors going between boards was too expensive. So, I
contrived a
stamped, board mounted, receptacle. That by itself wasn't very
interesting as those were already being sold by AMP. I eliminated
the coax plug by simply tinning the coax cable braid and the
center wire. We were using RG188a/u, which is the PTFE dielectric
version of
RG174a/u. Cut the end off squarely and remove the outer jacket.
Tin
the outer braid being carful not to let the braid bluge. Then run
it through a rotary blade stripper to trim the tinned braid to
length,
expose some dielectric, and strip the center conductor. Tin the
center conductor, trim, and you have the world's cheapest coax
plug.
<gasp> Oh man, I haven't gone that far yet...
Well, you asked for something cheaper than an RCA phono connector
pair and tinning the coax is certainly cheaper.
Not too sure about that, that is semi-skilled labor intensive.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- References:
- Low cost coax connectors
- From: Joerg
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: Joerg
- Re: Low cost coax connectors
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Low cost coax connectors
- Prev by Date: What the heck is going on with TI's Burr Brown parts manufacturing? - was Photodiode case
- Next by Date: Re: Low cost coax connectors
- Previous by thread: Re: Low cost coax connectors
- Next by thread: Re: Low cost coax connectors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|