Re: PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- From: Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:07:13 -0500
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:02:53 GMT, the renowned Jamie Morken
<jmorken@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
"Jamie Morken"
I was reading about the recommended trace spacing for signals based on
voltage levels from here:
http://pcbwizards.com/faq.htm
Near the bottom of the page it says IPC-2221 and IPC-2222 documents
recommend "0.0002 in./volt" (0.00508 mm/volt)
and gives a 0.1" spacing for 500Volts.
I am curious about the TO-220 package for this, since you can buy 600V
TO-220 devices, will they not pass UL (assuming UL uses similar voltage
spacings) since they don't have the recommended 0.1" spacing between
traces/pins?
** A TO220 pack is not a PCB.
There are no traces & the insulation material is quite different.
You have made an entirely false comparison.
I'd be interested in seeing a layout with a TO-220 that had trace
spacing above 100mil :)
cheers,
Jamie
No problem, you just 'stagger' the leads. It's commonly done on triacs
and such like. A minimum pad-to-pad spacing (not trace-to-trace) of
100 mils is not a problem even with a large annular ring and generoushole size.
Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@xxxxxxxxxxxx Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
.
- References:
- PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- From: Jamie Morken
- Re: PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- From: Jamie Morken
- PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- Prev by Date: Re: CGW glass-dielectric capacitors
- Next by Date: Re: Prototyping?
- Previous by thread: Re: PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- Next by thread: Re: PCB trace spacing for voltage levels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|