Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: Fred Bloggs <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:05:22 -0500
JosephKK wrote:
John Larkin jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx posted to
sci.electronics.design:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:13:10 GMT, JosephKK
<joseph_barrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
D from BC myrealaddress@xxxxxxxxx posted to sci.electronics.design:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:05:08 -0800, John Larkin<snip>
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:25:10 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:59:04 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:06:45 -0800, whit3rd <whit3rd@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Nov 4, 9:07 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:16:56 -0700, whit3rd
<whit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, use a nonretriggerable monostable with rising clock
So what happens when a really fast spike fires both
one-shots? What happens when an edge comes in just about the
time one or both one-shots is timing out?
The problem, as stated, requires a circuit to operate in four
different phases:
Phase A: wait for a rising edge, go high when it does
Phase B: stay high, ignore edges for 'a while'
Phase C: wait for a falling edge, go low when it does
Phase D: stay low, ignore edges for 'a while'
So, something with two monostables or latches or whatever is
required,
because the four states require two bits of state information.
And there are two time periods of some (presumably known)
duration to
be part of the mix. It's required BY THE PROBLEM to have some
kind of one-shot to handle that timing, unless you can use
higher- speed
Ok..if I hairballize your circuit a bit :)
D from BC
OK here is my suggestion:
5k
20 pF || ___
.-||-o-----|___|- 5v
| || |
| |
__ .-o-----. __
gnd --\ \| .-------------------| \
| | | | )o-
o--------o/__/| | .---|__/ | __
| | | | '-------| \
| | | | | )o-----o
| 9602 | )---------------)---' '--|__/ |
| | | | | | |
| '--o----' | | | |
| | | | '--+ +---'
| | | | \ /
| | | | X
| '--------------------| | / \
| | | .--+ +---.
| | | | |
| | | | |
| 5k | | | __ |
| 20 pF || ___ | | '--| \ |
| .-||-.-----|___|- 5v | | | )o--'
| | || | | | '-----|__/
| | | | | |
| __ .-------. | | |
'----\ \| | __ | | |
| | o-------| \ | | |
5v --o/__/| | | )o--)---)--------'
| | .--|__/ | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
9602 | '----)----------' |
'--o----' | |
| | |
| | |
----------o--------------'
A fast input spike can fire both one-shots! Then the fun begins.
John
Maybe, they are cross interlocked.
Is that 9602 the old Fairchild TTL one-shot? LOL, you must be old ....real old.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: JosephKK
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- References:
- Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: D from BC
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: whit3rd
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: whit3rd
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Fields
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: D from BC
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: JosephKK
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: JosephKK
- Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Prev by Date: Re: code to perform landing on autopilot possible?
- Next by Date: Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Previous by thread: Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Next by thread: Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|