Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Fields <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 18:46:37 -0600
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 07:21:04 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:18:04 -0500, Fred Bloggs <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
Or this.
http://s2.supload.com/free/Deglitch.JPG/view/
Your stuff is so ugleee, have to coin a new word: *uglionics* for what
you do...
It has the compensating virtues of being fast, being hazard free,
being simple, and doing exactly what was requested.
---
Hazard free? There still remains the RFI issue from all that
chatter, which you haven't adequately addressed.
---
Measuring the ugliness of your designs is like evaluating 0/0.
---
Fred's designs aren't ugly, they're just panoramic, and they work.
And, evaluating 0/0 to the limit leads to:
0
--- = 1
0
which would seem to lend credence to his designs as being valid, '1'
being assumed to be true.
--
JF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- References:
- Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: D from BC
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Fields
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: Tom Bruhns
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Fields
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- From: John Larkin
- Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Prev by Date: Re: How do infrared thermometers work?
- Next by Date: I can't pay next month's rent...
- Previous by thread: Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Next by thread: Re: Debouncing....at About 1Mhz
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
