Re: OT: new theory, it's not 42 either

On Nov 15, 4:40 pm, Martin Griffith <mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
fromhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0711.0770

An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything

figure 2 on page 18 is very pretty, didn't understand anything else
and 42 does not appear in the doc :-(

I didn't understand it either, but I did recognise a couple of the
names acknowledged - if it's for real I'll be disappointed. I'd been
hoping for an even simpler theory of everything - something I'd have
some hope of understanding.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.