Re: OT: new theory, it's not 42 either

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:14:58 +0100, Martin Griffith wrote:
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 15, 4:40 pm, Martin Griffith <mart_in_medina@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything

figure 2 on page 18 is very pretty, didn't understand anything else
and 42 does not appear in the doc :-(

I didn't understand it either, but I did recognise a couple of the names
acknowledged - if it's for real I'll be disappointed. I'd been hoping
for an even simpler theory of everything - something I'd have some hope
of understanding.

more here
http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2007/11/theoretically-simple-exception-of.html

These "theories" all claim to be "simple". Feh. They're all full of words
and fury and signify nothing.

If you want simple, go all the way back to Yin and Yang. The Yin is the
Universal Cosmic Magnetic Field, and the Yang is the Universal Cosmic
Electric Current that was induced by the movement of the Yin.

The Yang is Consciousness, and the Yin is Sentience.

All of the interesting stuff happens at the interface. Everything there
is is composed, at one level or another, of electromagnetic energy (or
matter, since they're interchangeable).

Once you understand the fractal nature of dimensionality, it all falls
into place and everything becomes as obvious as that pimple on your
ass. ;-)

Hope This Helps!
Rich

For more information, please feel free to visit:
http://www.godchannel.html
.

Relevant Pages