Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:24:58 -0800
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:43:10 -0600, Vladimir Vassilevsky
<antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Here is the basic realpole filter which is simpler and appears to have
almost identical response:
const u8 order = 4;
s32 LPF(s32 x)
{
static s32 z[order];
for(u8 i = 0; i < order; i++) x = z[i]+= (x - z[i])>>6;
return x;
}
Making digital filter as the simulation of an analog filter is rarely a
good idea.
I've sold over 3000 of the temperature controllers that use this
filter. So why is it not a good idea? Why so dogmatic?
More important, my filter has comments and yours doesn't.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- References:
- Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: faizankhan666@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- Prev by Date: Re: secondary transformer windings within a flyback converter
- Next by Date: Re: Herd instincts?
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- Next by thread: Re: Basic info needed regarding filters (FIR)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|