Re: SED Posts in the Wild
- From: "Vladimir Vassilevsky" <antispam_bogus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:49:07 -0600
"D from BC" <myrealaddress@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ro8fk35jfne9dcaa3t10ksjais6cnd2npm@xxxxxxxxxx
I'm nearing my 2000th post to SED!
Congratulations. You spent somewhat 500 hours for nothing.
It took me awhile to figure out why some people are on here.
My latest thought is..... for 'advertising' :)
I think people are quite conscious that they are here for leisure. The real
artists can't live without gathering the admiration. Some folks are whoring
here because whoring in the real life had become their second nature; not
for any specific purpose.
Question is: Is it effective advertising for an electronics designer?
No. Although it leads to the small deals occasionally, it is not any
effective.
Who reads the newsgroups? Mostly marginals, amateurs and stupidents; you
shouldn't expect much usefulness from that sort of public.
VLV
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SED Posts in the Wild -Guy Macon
- From: Guy Macon
- Re: SED Posts in the Wild
- From: D from BC
- Re: SED Posts in the Wild
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: SED Posts in the Wild
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Re: SED Posts in the Wild -Guy Macon
- References:
- SED Posts in the Wild
- From: D from BC
- SED Posts in the Wild
- Prev by Date: Re: Herd instincts?
- Next by Date: Re: precision low frequency generation (redux)
- Previous by thread: Re: SED Posts in the Wild
- Next by thread: Re: SED Posts in the Wild
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|