Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: JosephKK <joseph_barrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 05:09:25 -0800
Jim Thompson To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx posted to
sci.electronics.design:
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:40:56 -0800 (PST), JeffM <jeffm_@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Vladimir Vassilevsky wrote:
John Larkin wrote:What is good/bad about LTSpice?
[...]7. The schematics and graphs look good.
4. It's free, but support is good.
[...]
8. Mike makes sure it works under WINE as well
so the Linux folks aren't left out in the cold.
Unfortunately I find the graphical capabilities in the output not up
to the level I need to show my clients, otherwise I'd be a user.
By popular demand ;-), I'm becoming a multi-simulator person... now
using Cadence Virtuoso/Composer, soon will also be using SMASH and
SPE, and a sales person peddling SLED is visiting on December 13.
...Jim Thompson
If that is the SLED i suspect it is it will include gEDA and friends
(GAF) as an optional install.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: JeffM
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- References:
- Simulator of choice?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: Vladimir Vassilevsky
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: JeffM
- Re: Simulator of choice?
- From: Jim Thompson
- Simulator of choice?
- Prev by Date: Re: Simulator of choice?
- Next by Date: Re: Simulator of choice?
- Previous by thread: Re: Simulator of choice?
- Next by thread: Re: Simulator of choice?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|