Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:35:47 +0100
Jan Panteltje wrote:
So, while waiting for parts to arrive, I have been diddling sketches on an A4 piece
of paper, on how to design the the minimal cost attenuator, for the PIC scope I am planning.
Now I peaked at one scope I have here, and it has an 11 position switch
10mv, 20 mV, 50 mV, 100 mV, 200mV, 500mV, 11V, 2V, 5V, 10V, 20V
Now that sucks in a way, as counting to 5 is very difficult,
as we all think binary these days ;-)
You could make the attenuator steps user programmable through some setup menu.
BTW, why torture yourself with a PIC, when you can get a cheap LPCxxxx ARM that can be programmed in C ? The ARM also has a fast multiplier that makes scaling easy.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: David L. Jones
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- References:
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Prev by Date: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Next by Date: Re: Ohm's law
- Previous by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Next by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|