Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:04:13 GMT
On a sunny day (Wed, 16 Jan 2008 12:56:05 -0800 (PST)) it happened
a7yvm109gf5d1@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
<d7cbaa85-3563-4fe6-8ce2-9f264fa1e706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Jan 16, 2:54 pm, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We can have a cursor on the trace, and a volts display, so who cares even if it
switched ranges in octal ;-)
Trace? Real hackers just need the raw hex from the ADC.
I have done that debugging some audio stuff :-)
.
- References:
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Prev by Date: Re: Data*** Fluff
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Inflation in the US
- Previous by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Next by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Index(es):
