Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:16:00 GMT
Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:38:06 GMT) it happened Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<Orxjj.63678$eY.58290@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
It is just an experiment, I may do it in FPGA again, as that at least getsHeck, then you might as well go all out and hang one of these puppies up front, along with some ECL memory:
me into the > 50 MHz sampling, while PIC will be limited to some kHz (think 25kHz).
http://cache.national.com/ds/DC/ADC083000.pdf
That is a very nice chip, really.
It will also need some very nice memory :-)
It will also require a really nice bank account ;-)
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
.
- References:
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Arlet Ottens
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Prev by Date: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Next by Date: Re: Evaluating if a salary is fair for a EE position
- Previous by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Next by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Index(es):