Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 23:55:40 GMT
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:04:23 +0000, Joerg wrote:
Like with all things that is what engineers have become used to. Change
it and you'll hear complaints. After all a foot still has 12 inches,
most currencies go 10-20-50-100, there are 12 months in a year and so
on. Remember when they wanted to change a full circle from 360 to 400
degrees? Nobody bit.
There was never any need: 360 degrees == 400 grads. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- References:
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- From: Joerg
- Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Prev by Date: Re: Evaluating if a salary is fair for a EE position
- Next by Date: Re: Line Voltage Has Offset
- Previous by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Next by thread: Re: Scope attenuators 1,2,5, why bother?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|